Rai "wasted" (for what it does and could do in terms of production of cultural programs, art, etc.).. So called an intervention for the 25 years of regional offices. But today I must add: RAI partial (and subject to interruption of public service) in the information of what happens in the region. I had already informed the
Rai Marche this "bias" on previous events, such as that of his absence at a celebration of a Oscar winner, or his absence to the Bachelor of Edoardo Sanguineti etc. in Macerata.
These days I wrote to the direction of Marche Rai to reiterate that he was going to end on Giorgio Gaber Cagli Festival. I look forward - this after further prompting - to see the presence of a troupe Rai for exclusive regional "God Child" Gaber / Luporini with Eugenio Allegri. More in the afternoon they were planning a major conference and a historical reading of the text "gray" with three actors and view photos of the staging of Enrica Scalfari Gaber / Whittaker / Rossi of "Waiting for Godot" by Beckett.
But on this occasion, we recorded the absence TG3. But how is it possible that from 9 February to 6 March 2008, with seven days and fifteen steps, the TG3 Marche has not had the "duty" to inform the public of these regional meetings?
They moved from Rome, Florence, Milan to attend the Festival. It 'came a troupe of Rai Educational Giovanni Minoli, have spoken of the Corriere della Sera, la Repubblica, the Swiss TV through a host of meetings planned in Cagli. But the TG3 Marche did not consider that the information could have a space in its TG.
We are facing a clear and unjustified illegality of public service television. You can not "overshadow" the information! I was a member of the Security Service of the RAI Marche and I think it's right by the citizen to have the information of general relief. It is a duty of Rai play an information service.
prof. Massimo Puliani
PS: not about cultural information, BUT IT 'WELL REMEMBER:
"To complement the crime of interruption of public service in art. Cod.pen 340 is sufficient that the entity disturbance of the regularity of office or termination thereof, without having caused specifically the effect of a cessation of activity or a real lasting disruption of the operation, were likely to affect the timely, orderly and efficient development of the service, in terms of limited duration and involved only one sector
E 'as confirmed by the Criminal Section VI of the Supreme Court in Case No. 26,077 filed June 9, 2004.
08/03/2008
0 comments:
Post a Comment